(2 Samuel 12:20) Then David arose from the earth, and washed, and anointed himself, and changed his apparel, and came into the house of the LORD, and worshipped: then he came to his own house; and when he required, they set bread before him, and he did eat. ed. Which just leaves the question of who came up with the variation and why.. whether it's the BHS authors that did. In v. 24 the KJV reads, Ye blind guides, which strain at a gnat, and swallow a camel. The Greek verb means to strain out. I believe that the KJV of 1611 actually had this wording, but inexplicably changed it later to strain at. Some scholars argue that strain at is simply an archaic rendering of strain out. But, even if this is the case, few in the KJV camp today would interpret this phrase as strain out.7 Here is a place in which the KJV needs to be updated so that people can understand what is meant. Apparently Tischendorff's 1841 Greek NT was the first printed edition to omit this clause. Reason: The verse closely resembles Mark 9:29, but it is lacking in Matthew in (original handwriting), B, , some Italic & Syriac & Coptic & Ethiopic manuscripts. The second difference reflects the fact that not all early source texts include this bit of the Lord's Prayer. Reason: The emphasized words, although by now a very familiar quotation, are omitted from the RV and most other modern versions; it was also omitted by the Wycliffe (1380) and Rheims (1582) versions. Site design / logo 2023 Stack Exchange Inc; user contributions licensed under CC BY-SA. [18] In modern conservative Greek editions it is also omitted from the main text of Scrivener's Greek NT according to the Textus Receptus, and the two Majority Text editions. The apocrypha is a selection of books which were published in the original 1611 King James Bible. Reason: The earliest Greek manuscript (Ea/E2) of the New Testament to include this verse dates from the late sixth or early seventh century[26][27] and it is only found in Western witnesses to the text with many minor variations. The Reasons the Protestant Church excludes them is as follows: 1. I have now spent five years studying Gods Word and am more inquisitive than ever before. Out of the 421 total changes amounting to only five one-hundredths of a percent, the following should be noted -. The text that follows is a list of the verses in their modern KJV version; beneath each verse is a catalog of the changes in that verse from the 1611 version to the latest KJV. Those which contain it vary much from each other." It would seem possible that, originally, 7:52 was immediately followed by 8:12, and somehow this pericope was inserted between them, interrupting the narrative.[135]. ", Reasons: This verse is similar to Luke 22:37. Myth 1: The Hebrew Bible does not contain the deuterocanonical books. Second, this gentlemans own statistics show that the count of 100,000 could not possibly be attributable to font changes alone: if so, then there should be nearly 791,328 changes (according to this gentlemans word-count of the total words in the KJV [a number which, by the way, may include part of the Apocrypha1]). On the other hand, these 12 verses occur in slightly less ancient Greek mss, A,C,D,K,,13, and a "vast number" of others,[14] and a great many mss of the ancient versions, and is quoted by some other Church Fathers, the earliest being Irenaeus, in the late second century (although his quotations are imprecise). Reason: Many (perhaps most) modern versions emulate the Revised Version and simply omit the sentence in question, without any explanatory comment. As the adage goes, Those who live in glass houses shouldnt throw stones.. The difference is probably due to a wrong count somewhere, the possible incorporating of English titles as part of the text of scripture, or the inclusion of some material from the Apocrypha. At some point, two other people, dissatisfied with the abrupt ending at verse 8, and writing independently of each other, supplied the Longer and the Shorter endings. baseball font with tail generator. The reason for the presence or absence of the brief doxology at the end of the Lord's Prayer is actually liturgical use. But it is no part of that gospel. (all in bold type omitted in modern versions). Out of a grand total of 421 changes from 1611 to the present, almost 300 of the 421 are of this exact nature! For me, I get goose bumps. Why is it that this error is defended as inspired while other printing errors are not? Does a summoned creature play immediately after being summoned by a ready action? God spoke the world in to existence. why does the kjv have extra versesinternational criminal court objectives roles and functions. Blessed is the man that trusteth in the Lord, and whose hope the Lord is. Answer. Jerome was the first to describe the extra 7 Old Testament books as the "Apocrypha" (doubtful authenticity). The resulting text looks like this (from the Revised Version): RV: 6 Who moreover assayed to profane the temple; on whom we also laid hold;8 from whom thou wilt be able, by examining him thyself, to take knowledge of all these things, whereof we accuse him. ), Reasons: The same verse or a very similar verse appears (and is preserved) as Matthew 27:15 and as Mark 15:6. So the WLC got its chapter and verse divisions from the BHS. How do I align things in the following tabular environment? Acts 28:29. How to react to a students panic attack in an oral exam? RV: 55But he turned and rebuked them. Several 1 placed it at the very end of the Gospel of John, and Scrivener adds several more that have so placed a shorter pericope beginning at verse 8:3. I am not, of course, arguing that this is the case; I am arguing that there is a great deal of selective evidence used by KJV-only advocates used to support their position. How can we proceed with this comparison? The newer versions stated that other versions ADD verses inferring that the other version(s) are less accurate. Which division came first(The KJV one, or the BHS one? Among the manuscripts that contain this sentence-and-a-half, there are many variations and permutations.[25]. Why does the Lord's Prayer The "Apocrypha" remained in the King James Bible through the 1626, 1629, 1630, and the 1633 editions. The Catholic Bible is a more generic term for the Holy Bible. They appear only in later sources such as P (9th century) and several minuscules, and a smattering of Italic mss.. And yet, Wallace clearly intended his reader to believe that the King James Bible of 1611 is significantly different than the King James of today. I did mention more in my question about how Stephen Langton used the Vulgate and would've added the chapters to the Vulgate.. This comes out to a total of 766,137 words, or 25,191 words shorter than the number provided by Scott. And I see that it has 4 Chapters in Malachi, like the KJV.. which suggests that the BHS chapter divisions are a departure. This is a great space to write long text about your company and your services. This ought to be a good test-case for whether there are 421 total changes or 100,000 changes to the KJV in its nearly 400-year history. It appears before verse 13 in K,W, and several minuscules. [4] Howbeit many of them which heard the word believed; and the number . How many chapters did he put in Joel and how many in Malachi? [115] Yet, out of that small number, 16 words do not appear elsewhere in the Gospel of Mark, 5 words are used here in a different way than used elsewhere in Mark, and 4 phrases do not appear elsewhere in Mark. Some versions, including pre-KJV versions such as the Tyndale Bible, the Geneva Bible, and the Bishops Bible, treat the italicized words as a complete verse and numbered as 12:18, with similar words. [3] And they laid hands on them, and put them in hold unto the next day: for it was now eventide. Entirely omitted words: it is hard for thee to kick against the pricks. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top, Not the answer you're looking for? Thou hast given him his heart's desire, and hast not withholden the request of his lips. [verse 8] For at those words, in almost all copies of the Gospel According to Mark, comes the end. Latin, Syriac, and others - and does not appear until H,L, and P (all 9th century). The Nestle-Aland and UBS Greek editions enclose it in double brackets. The King James Bible Removed Verses October 21, . Therefore, we should expect to find none in these twelve verses, statistically speaking (or, more precisely, about one-sixth of one change). Posted by . (Therefore the source of the WLC is the BHS). [139], Some scholars have suggested that the pericope is not written in the same style as the rest of the Fourth Gospel, and have suggested it is written more in the style of the Gospel of Luke, a suggestion supported by the fact that the 13 manuscripts actually put the pericope into the Gospel of Luke. why does the kjv have extra verses. You can use this space to go into a little more detail about your company. But KJV-only advocates typically link inspiration to preservation to accessibility in such a way that logically makes printers errors a part of the package. I read from the KJV & I did a side by side to see if what I was told is true. Words are things. What video game is Charlie playing in Poker Face S01E07? It is important to read the surrounding scriptures to get an understanding of the impact the omission of the above verses really have. for ye devour widows' houses, and for a pretence make long prayer: therefore ye shall receive the greater damnation. why does the kjv have extra verses . "[79], KJV: 9 Now when Jesus was risen early the first day of the week, he appeared first to Mary Magdalene, out of whom he had cast seven devils.10 And she went and told them that had been with him, as they mourned and wept.11 And they, when they had heard that he was alive, and had been seen of her, believed not.12 After that he appeared in another form unto two of them, as they walked, and went into the country.13 And they went and told it unto the residue: neither believed they them.14 Afterward he appeared unto the eleven as they sat at meat, and upbraided them with their unbelief and hardness of heart,because they believed not them which had seen him after he was risen.15 And he said unto them, Go ye into all the world, and preach the gospel to every creature.16 He that believeth and is baptized shall be saved; but he that believeth not shall be damned.17 And these signs shall follow them that believe; In my name shall they cast out devils; they shall speak with new tongues;18 They shall take up serpents;[80] and if they drink any deadly thing, it shall not hurt them; they shall lay hands on the sick, and they shall recover.19 So then after the Lord had spoken unto them, he was received up into heaven, and sat on the right hand of God.20 And they went forth, and preached every where, the Lord working with them, and confirming the word with signs following. This Shorter Ending appears, by itself without the Longer Ending, after verse 8, in only one manuscript, an Italic ms (Codex Bobbiensis, "k"), of the 4th or 5th century. William Orme] (1830, London), reprinted (1872, Boston, "a new edition, with notes and an appendix by Ezra Abbot" ); and The Three Witnesses the disputed text in St. John, considerations new and old by Henry T. Armfield (1893, London); and many more. Amen. 2 Inexplicably, Scott speaks of valid changes as those that include words only. It was not included in the RSV, but is set forth in a footnote to verse 14 in the NRSV with the comment that "other ancient authorities [sic plural] add, in whole or part". If, on the other hand, there are 100,000 changes to the KJV, that averages out to one out of nearly eight words (1:7.91328 is the precise ratio), or 45.745 words.2 Thus, if my statistics are correct, we should expect to find one or more instances per verse, on average, and a grand total in the double digits. In fact, there is a denominational distinction as well: the standard Catholic version of the Lord's Prayer does not include it, but most Protestants do put it in. Just take a look at the "blasphemous comma." In some editions of the King James Bible, a single comma was removed that made Jesus sound like a criminal. NIV (the latest version, I think is 2010). [5][bettersourceneeded], The citations of manuscript authority use the designations popularized in the catalog of Caspar Ren Gregory, and used in such resources (which are also used in this remainder of this article) as Souter,[6] Nestle-Aland,[7] and the UBS Greek New Testament[8] (which gives particular attention to "problem" verses such as these). Although the longer ending appears in 99 percent of the surviving Greek mss and most ancient versions,[85] there is strong evidence, both external and internal, for concluding that it was not part of the original text of the Gospel. Why would the word lips be so significant? peter macari age. Browse other questions tagged, Start here for a quick overview of the site, Detailed answers to any questions you might have, Discuss the workings and policies of this site. What can the West do about the Islamic Problem? Bible translation differences. (Some say "it stood" the he or it being the Dragon mentioned in the preceding verses) Among pre-KJV versions, the Great Bible and the Rheims version also have "he stood". Is a PhD visitor considered as a visiting scholar? Acts 24:7. However, its recurrence as verse 24 is not so well supported. "[38] It was omitted in the Complutensian edition, and included in Erasmus's editions only because he found it as a late note in the margin of a secondary manuscript and, from Erasmus, it found its way into other Textus Receptus editions and then the KJV. [118] The stylistic differences suggest that none of these was written by the author of the Gospel of St. Mark. The facts condemn the critics and expose their smoke-and-mirror shell game. Connect and share knowledge within a single location that is structured and easy to search. Matthew 18:11 The leader of such people would be Satan. [111], As a result, there are five possible endings to the Gospel of Mark: (1) An abrupt ending at end of verse 8; (2) the Longer Ending following verse 8; (3) the Longer Ending including the "Freer Logion"; (4) the Shorter Ending following verse 8; and (5) the Shorter and Longer endings combined (and we could add as a sixth possible ending, anything after verse 8 enclosed in brackets or otherwise distinguished with indicia of doubt). jackie's danville, va store hours. If Scotts statistics are correct, to find more than one or two would be disturbing, and to find even a dozen or more would show that his data are fundamentally incorrect. In most instances another verse, elsewhere in the New Testament and remaining in modern versions, is very similar to the verse that was omitted because of its doubtful provenance. It is believed to have been assimilated from Mark.[12]. The differences between the NKJV and KJV Bible translations. The last words of verse 8 are, in Greek, , usually translated "for they were afraid". Conybeare theorized that Ariston was the Armenian version of the Greek name Aristion. These manuscripts are ultimately the ones on which the KJV was based. Some of these lists of "missing verses" specifically mention "sixteen verses" although the lists are not all the same. Since we have so many manuscripts of the New Testament, we have lots of evidence to work with as we discern the original form of the writings. [45] While verse 7 is omitted in its entirety, parts of verse 6 and verse 8 are also omitted. Unlike the Dan Browns theories the Rose Line or Sangreal, the Bible is the most powerful book in human existence and therefore, only those who are intent on diminishing its powers would ever want to change it. The phrase "wrote on the ground" does not require that Jesus wrote, Several late manuscripts namely U, , 73, 331, 364, 700, 782, 1592 and some Armenian mss end this sentence "the sins of each of them." It may not be an instant, miraculous change, but when you receive God's forgiveness, He will give you strength to change your life. I will update the question again accordingly to take this into account, as we now have a source for the KJV's chapter divisions. The translators claim at least 40000 mistakes in the KJV. It is the fourth edition in the Biblia Hebraica series started by Rudolf Kittel and is published by the Deutsche Bibelgesellschaft (German Bible Society) in Stuttgart.The Biblia Hebraica Stuttgartensia the editors have "accordingly refrained from removing obvious scribal errors" (these have then been noted in the critical apparatus)[it] is meant to be an exact copy of the Masoretic Text as recorded in the Leningrad Codex.exception to that is the Rafe diacritic..One more difference to the Leningrad Codex is the book order, the Books of Chronicles have been moved to the end as it appears in common Hebrew bibles, even though it precedes Psalms in the codex.". This averages out to one change per 8.83 words. And it seems the difference is in Bible versions. "It's not meant to replace your current version of . Browse other questions tagged, Like any library, Christianity Stack Exchange offers great information, but, Start here for a quick overview of the site, Detailed answers to any questions you might have, Discuss the workings and policies of this site. The division of the Vulgate into chapters was made in the 13th century, and Jews began adopting the numbers for use in concordances by the mid fourteen hundreds, yet until Bomberg, no Hebrew bible had ever included the chapter numbers as part of the book itself. Talk about what services you provide. Since the first King James Bible rolled off the press in 1611 to the King James Bible you buy off the shelf today, there have been - are you ready - there have been a grand total of 421 word changes! [36] This verse was not found in the Syriac Peshitta, with the result that a printed edition of the Peshitta inserted the verse translated into Syriac by the editors,[36] It is similarly missing from p45, 74, , A,B,C,P,, and a multitude of other codices and cursives. Since then i've found that the WLC(Westminster Leningrad Codex aka WTT - Westminster Theological Text), is a digitized version of the BHS, and the BHS has chapters and verses. ', Last edited on 24 February 2023, at 00:55, Today's English Version (the Good News Bible), personal reflection, personal essay, or argumentative essay, Learn how and when to remove this template message, An Historical Account of Two Notable Corruptions of Scripture, http://www.asureguidetoheaven.org/onebible.pdf, "Missing Verses & changed words in modern Bibles compared to the KJV? No, it is not true. KJV: 3 . A belief apparently not shared by anyone else: "No one maintains that this rather florid passage belongs to the original Mark not ever to the original form of the long ending of the Textus Receptus." ( Psalm 40:5 ) Does "And Your thoughts toward us;" mean that God is Specifically thinking about us? As Conybeare described it:[98] "Now in this codex the Gospel of Mark is copied out as far as [i.e., the end of 16:8]. Well, it is. you will not . It seems a lot less effort just to add the clarification rather than to argue over what it's reasonable to expect people to know/be able to look up, at such length. Mark. I checked the Chinese translation it also has the equivalent of "For yours is the kingdom and power and glory, for ever. Yet this error is defended by KJV-only advocates as though it came from the pen of the apostle John himself. I will lift up mine eyes unto the hills, from whence cometh my help. The NAB, like Bomberg, has 4 in Joel. Each member of the task-force was arranged in six groups. Pontificae Commissionis de re Biblica Edita. It does not appear here in the majority of important codices, such as ,B,C,D,L,W,,, and Latin, Sahidic, and some Syriac and Boharic manuscripts.